Many countries tax systems hugely favor debt over equity.

Unsustainable private debt problems must be resolved by defaults, debt reductions, and conversion of debt into equity.

Banks often oppose higher equity asset ratios, because equity capital is more expensive than debt capital.

The typical bank is capitalized with equity, long term debt, short term debt, and deposits.

The typical bank is capitalized with equity, long term debt, short term debt, and deposits. Investment banks like Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers got into trouble because they had too little equity capital far less than 10 .

But, while debt forgiveness benefits holders of both equity and debt, debt holders don t voluntarily agree to it for two reasons.

This has led to heightened volatility in equity, money, and debt markets.

Fifth, debt burdens that cannot be eased by growth, savings, or inflation must be rendered sustainable through orderly debt restructuring, debt reduction, and conversion of debt into equity.

Under Chapter 11, companies with a solid underlying business generally swap debt for equity. Old equity holders are wiped out and old debt claims are transformed into equity claims in the new entity which continues operating with a new capital structure.

As corporate finance experts have been saying for 30 years, having too much debt and too little equity is costly, so reducing the face value of debt can sometimes benefit not only equity holders, but also debt holders.

When companies go bankrupt, a debt equity swap is a fair and efficient solution.

Following that, the restructured bank can be recapitalized by raising new debt and equity.

It lists already 1,000 entities that are offering debt and equity for social enterprise.

Based on those values, contracts with existing equity and debt holders should then be restructured.

Forcing a debt for equity swap or debt forgiveness would be no greater a violation of private property rights than a massive bailout.

It was the equivalent of a Chapter 11 restructuring of American corporate debt, in which debt is swapped for equity, with bondholders becoming new shareholders.

As during the Great Depression and in many debt restructurings, it makes sense in the current contingency to mandate partial debt forgiveness or a debt for equity swap in the financial sector.

Central banks and finance ministries are also complicit, since debt gets bailed out far more aggressively than equity does.

And debt and equity markets may not continue to respond benignly to the Fed s wind down of quantitative easing.

Converting some portion of debt to equity under predetermined solvency threatening conditions would provide an extra layer of protection.

As a result, commercial providers of debt or equity cannot get the high returns and quick exits that they seek.

Likewise, economists have long noted that for countries gorging on capital inflows, there is a big difference between debt instruments and equity like investments, including both stocks and foreign direct investment.

Worrying is like paying a debt you don't owe.

If there is more equity, then logically debt should be cheaper, as the company (or bank) is better insulated from default.

But there is an alternative that essentially means playing by the rules of a normal market economy a debt for equity swap.

Can we engineer new debt contracts for countries like Argentina?

Taming the Private Equity Locusts

Domestic resource mobilization, remittances from expatriate workers, private debt and equity flows, and philanthropic contributions exceed official international aid by a wide margin.

Our global debt mechanics are looking increasingly like a Ponzi scheme.

But in bad times, when it is important to keep banks lending, bank capital would automatically be increased by the debt to equity conversion.

Moreover, you should care about equity.

Instead, they focused exclusively on US foreign debt, ignoring household debt (mortgage and consumer debt), public debt, business debt, and financial debt.

If the losses are big enough that existing equity and debt holders are wiped out, government insurers should make up the difference to protect depositors.

For lenders, debt could be converted, wherever possible, into equity in MDG projects with earning potential, while building up poor countries capacity for self reliance.

If the losses are big enough that existing equity and debt holders are wiped out, government insurers should make up the difference to protect depositors.

18. Takes note of the recent discussions and assessment by the Paris Club of the proposal for Debt for Equity in Millennium Development Goal Projects

Banks serve a special function in the economy that does warrant a special role for the government not in setting pay, but in imposing effective capital requirements. Higher and pro cyclical equity capital requirements on banks, combined with a requirement to raise contingent long term debt debt that converts into equity in a crisis is a better way forward.

Some large firms, such as Apple, hold virtually no debt at all. Greater reliance on equity would give banks a much larger cushion to absorb losses.

Pay equity? Yes. Absolutely a feminist issue.

Debt

America has a special procedure for corporate bankruptcy, called Chapter 11, which allows a speedy restructuring by writing down debt, and converting some of it to equity.

Unemployment up. Housing values down. Equity markets down.

Prosperity with equity is important for the region.

US debt hardly looks like a bargain right now, even without the sinking dollar.

This is why equity capital held by financial institutions typically is more than twice as expensive as debt capital and why these institutions try to minimize its use.