Case dismissed without prejudice or refiling in small claims court.

Maybe you've got a claim in small claims court for your lost pair of pants for 100, but not in a court of general jurisdiction for millions of dollars.

Of the 4 claims, three claims have been satisfied, while in one case court proceedings have been closed.

Non judicially determined claims have not been tested in a court.

The court imposed a small fine on the driver.

Yugoslavia is pressing many of these legal claims before the International Court of Justice.

By judgement of 16 April 1999, the Oslo City Court rejected the authors' claims.

For that purpose, the Court divided the area of overlapping claims into three zones.

The Court forwarded his request for a rehearing to the Town Court of Brno, which rejected his claims on 24 June 1991.

152 claims settled administratively or by Court decisions without payment. Issues relating to technical provisions

The Court held nevertheless that claims of non parties that derived from the main claims ought to be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration.

The agrochemical and GM industry claims that small scale, agroecological farming, is backward and inefficient.

Furthermore, the court partially granted the complainants' civil claims in the amount of 1.2 million roubles.

The Committee had received reports that the majority of compensation claims were settled out of court.

Furthermore, regional Powers could sometimes block the legitimate claims of small States in a particular region.

This court was responsible for investigating claims that Morsi had escaped from prison during the 2011 revolution.

3.2 The author claims that the judges of the Plock District Court were neither independent nor impartial.

In the instant case, the Committee notes that both the Circuit Court and Supreme Court considered the author's claims and it finds no evidence that these court decisions suffered from such defects.

4.3 The State party claims that the complainant received the full compensation awarded to him by the court.

4.3 The State party claims that the complainant received the full compensation awarded to him by the court.

The State party claims that the conviction and sentence of the author were reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Furthermore, the court partially granted the complainants' civil claims against Deni Mirzoev in the amount of 1.2 million roubles.

The author claims that his right to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher court was violated.

The Lands and Title Division of the High Court adjudicates claims to traditional matai titles and property boundary disputes.

He further claims that he was effectively unrepresented before the Court of Appeal, as his court appointed representative merely stated that he found no merits in arguing the appeal.

The Panel observes that D1 claims are typically for small amounts and that the risk of overstatement is minimal.

The Court thus found that it had no authority to order these other parties to submit their claims to arbitration.

The Court therefore based its decision not solely on procedural grounds, but on a substantive assessment of the author's claims.

Initially, it was the policy to provide direct access to the Land Claims Court for virtually all claimants of land.

Court claims by citizens related to access to environmental information or participation in decision making also refer to the Convention.

The author also claims that he was not present at the hearing of his appeal before the Court of Appeal.

Claims?

It is submitted that, in so far as these claims concern France, they are identical to the claims which were dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Caen on 17 October 1990.

We need an International Court for Minorities that would act in similar ways to the International Court of Justice to make decisions concerning the legitimacy of claims in this area.

She further claims that there was no evidence of the murders being committed in aggravating circumstances, as found by the Court.

With respect to his appeal, the author claims that his court appointed lawyer did not appear at all for the hearing.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

She claims that no translator was present during the District Court hearing of 22 July 1999 and that the contradictions the court found in her story are attributable to problems of interpretation.

Duplicate claims are two or more claims filed by an individual in the same claims category.

As a consequence, these claims are not overlapping claims.

Withdrawn claims

(b) Claims

Claims process

Claims process

(EX CLAIMS)